Subject: Conservatives do exploit the poor
9-22-09
Of course there are various degrees: The rich manipulated the poor the most unfairly when slavery was a law. Today, Fox News just spins everything for what remains. (Prejudice doesn’t profit, it’s just dumb.) Eventually, a total fairness system will be reality, not by communism, but by maintaining higher pay for the harder jobs, to retain enthusiasm and motivation. Then the only deciding factor will be if one wants to do the harder jobs (which can include hard labor or lots of college). Poor people a-gripin’ – hey opportunity awaits, and would be guaranteed. Rich people a-gripin’ – hey, quit working so hard. Employee digging the ditch a-gripin’ – hey, get a lesser paying job in the air conditioned office. Boss in the air conditioned office a-gripin’ – hey, get paid more by digging the ditch yourself. This country is full of all types. So, hey, if you’re a greed sucker, here’s the shovel. If you’re a lazy bum, you’ll still get some exercise by having to walk to the office printer.
The natural goal in life is to do the least, or the easiest job, and get paid the most. Right? But, unfortunately, it’s unfair.
I’m always searching for exceptions, but most of the time, it’s easy to stereotype:
Antichrist faith alone, Antichrist anti-sex, Antichrist GOP (for the rich and against the poor), and Antichrist “Respect Life!” but still eats meat, all seems to mesh together. Of course, the “opposite” isn’t much better: atheist, all the sex you can get while there are still STDs, tax the rich to feed the poor instead of just feeding the poor, and kill the baby at nine months. (I’ll bet you that the libido degree is the deciding difference.) Me, I find the answers in-between the two extremes. Since both stereotypes would “agree” that the Goldenrule is a good thing, that proves that eventually it will be. Not millions, hundreds, or just two, but, the world needs just “one” person (of very high influence) who can decipher the most fair mechanism. Without that “one” person, where everyone else’s continued judgments are based on their self-centered pride, the world will be destroyed; or, the world will have to continue to learn “the hard way.” Barack Obama is just another example of having to learn “the hard way”; and, thinks we can “win” in Afghanistan against people who just want revenge, by giving them more reasons for wanting revenge. (I seriously doubt they all want to die just so burqas can become law again.)
If my stuff was just “known” to the world, with the disclaimer that no one has to do it, that would be enough; as I’ve been at a point for years where I know I can refute all arguments. Just “the thought” of my reckonings, but denied, would be enough, as today, troubled people apparently can’t reason it out alone; but, would eventually be able to with my pre-written help. Go ahead and call me “the looniest person who has ever lived.” That would make it “possible” for the future to know a better way.
Selfishness, and the true apathy against others, has not changed one bit for mankind through the centuries, and won’t in the future (on the current path). Sure, technologies have really progressed since the end of slavery (now in a state of regression fueled by said greed factor), but personal attitudes haven’t changed one bit. So, today’s church doesn’t do anything. Today’s atheists haven’t improved a thing. A logic overruling the taught standard, and a pithy fear of God is the only way. And, you can’t get more pithy than the “Goldenrule.” Jesus stated that the Goldenrule is the sole determining factor in how we will be judged in Matthew 25:34-46, but no one today apparently knows it, or fears it. Is that because of the atheists? No. It’s because of a corrupt church. And, “sex” is, by far, the stronghold key. So, try for a second to realize how dumb you all really, really are, when you call me a “pervert.” Of course, all this would have to be “explained” to the world, or the world will just think they’re all smart for calling me a “pervert.” That would just (initially) give support for the anti-sex people.
Today, no one can apparently believe that something that big and historically influential could be that wrong. Sure, pro-sex people will look at the corrupted English definition of fornication, and that’ll be all it takes to “trust” that Jesus was against sex. None (to any degree) will research the etymologies and find the corruptions. So today, there can be only two kinds of beliefs: (1) If you’re a (corrupt) “Christian,” Jesus was anti-sex; or (2) If you’re pro-sex or an atheist, Jesus was anti-sex. And, I’m not supposed to conclude that we have a major “dumb” problem. Many people advice me that I’m not going to get anywhere calling people dumb; but, if I don’t actually say “dumb,” I’m not optimally explaining the real problem; and, it will die as a result. It’s impossible to call people smart while explaining “why” they believe what they’ve been taught. If I call someone smart for running to their death in front of a machine gun, is that going to make them not want to do it? I’m fully aware of the automatic anger and instance forever rejection I get when I tell someone they lack the “ability” to think outside the box. But, me trying to dance around these subjects trying to compliment to bootlick isn’t going get the real message across. Such would only fit me in either the one or the other extreme established categories; which can be divided by (1) never been a real victim, to (2) been a victim, know there has to be a better way, but don’t know what it is. I’m sure there are some exceptions.
A good example of thinking between the extremes is the war issue:
Many of you know that I’m very anti-war. But, I am not anti-violence or anti-torture. Waterboarding, etc. is totally ethically justified when it has to do with preventing the hurting/killing of “innocent” people. In this case, Americans who aren’t in Iraq are basically innocent. (Americans in Iraq, because of all the innocent people we killed during and after our invasion, have no justification for stopping an Iraqi who seeks revenge. Any American just being in Iraq today is representing and signifying that the killing of the innocent Iraqis was just.) Concerning “war,” when you have thousands/millions of men in one country fighting against thousands/millions of men in another country, it just blows my mind as it only proves how really, really “dumb” humans really, really are, and that they only know what they’ve been taught. And, that the favoritism for family, school, town, state, and then country, is a natural attitude that is in need of religious change. The vastly ignored (thanks to church cop-outs) Goldenrule is still the answer. It’s not the message of Jesus that’s wrong, it’s the corruption and spin telling what the rich want to hear, is the wrong. Specifically concerning war/violence: Never hurt an “innocent” person is the correct and most pithy thing to teach. Else, humans are definitely not going to get it.
And, the real present danger is those who think that the Israeli cop-out to control Jerusalem isn’t powerful enough to trigger things getting out of hand with Russia or China very quickly. Those will truly believe they have things under control, until they find that it just became out of control, as major retaliations usually don’t come with a warning (like Pearl Harbor, D-Day, Germany’s invasion of Russia, etc.). All someone has to do is make the right degree of threats, as Hannity / alQaeda types live on. The (inner) dumbness of guys like O’Reilly and Obama can also cause it. In an intelligent person’s mind, it does make sense that religious cop-outs of the Goldenrule will end the world. But, when I talk to church leaders, they’re 100% adamant about not changing it. That probably indicates that there’s a 100% chance of the world ending by war. What was popular in the 1950s was knowing what to do when Russia starts nuclear bombing the United States. Today, the threat is much more extensive, overshadowed by the sense that it just hasn’t happened yet. Oh, I know, no one whats to hear any more about the nearing destruction of the world – it’s very old hat.
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=37&dat=19020405&id=9HcDAAAAIBAJ&sjid=bikDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4011,727034, “Ostrich Logic”:
Sexual love:
I can see it as the solution to lots of major problems (once managed correctly). I can also see that humans aren’t able to currently know it, because it is so powerful that when it’s corrupted, it fully controls; as much as it will fully control correctly with the Goldenrule, once managed correctly. But, today, unrequited love will still cause much sadness, even murder and brutality; where today’s anti-sex standard only pleases conservatives who aren’t smart enough to think outside the box. That’s the more correct definition of “conservative”: “One who can’t think outside the box.” When luck and unfairness works to their advantage, they’re not even going to consider it.
The new health care “penalty”:
Right after my last email, I heareded on Fox News that Obama does plan to force a penalty on those who don’t purchase health insurance. So, my question now is, is the penalty going to be less than the cost of the health insurance? If it is, then hillbillies from Arkansas will say: “Hey, ma. I’m savin’ a-whole heapin bunch of dough by just uh-payin’ the penalty ‘stead of uh-payin’ the health insurance; ‘cause I can still get health insurance for a month when I gets me one of dem dare pre-existin’ conditioners; as long as the truck starts so’z we can’uh drive up-duh Jonesboro tuh getta duh operation.” Or, if the penalty matches or exceeds the cost of health insurance, then Hannity and O’Reilly oughta be pleased, as Obama has finally found a way to tax the poor to keep the rich happy. Plus, what’s the penalty or jail time for not payin’ the penalty? (Hannity could really start likin’ this.)
That there logic, along with the unsolvable Afghanistan problem tells me God’za pressurin’ duh handsome Mr. Obama tuh just-a start-two listenin’ tuh me. Just printing up the government’s money is the solution dare; and, West Texas is likely the answer to all dem Muslim problems. No, I’m not sayin’ send the Talibaners tuh West Texas, I’m sayin’ sent the Jews to West Texas. Build’em a wall that says “The Ulitimate Smart Cop-out Wall to Heaven.” What might also be sumart is to let the Taliban know that if they are successful in makin’ us run chicken, then the present Afghanistan government isn’t going to be pullin’ any punches in their effort to kill all the Talibandies. You see, we “endeavor” to not kill civilians, but the present Afghan government will gladly kill every man, woman and child in all those areas where they think Talibanditos are-uh hiding. So, even the Taliban might be smart enough to believe that Americans should stay in Afghanistan – just so’s tuh keep duh present government from successfully killing all Talibanos. Then the Talibanites can merge back into an accepting (Freedom) society, of course as long as they don’t cause any trouble (like St. Paul, MN did for the gangsters). Then put – seriously – Dairy Queens in the new Taliban migrated areas. (Because happy fat men just don’t make great fighters.)
I say if the Jews can get special attention from God by talking to the Western Wall, then recently caught pedophile Phillip Garrido should be able to certainly hear angels from his black box. Garrido says his black box has “special powers.” Of course, you all think I’m crazy for thinking Garrido can hear angels from his black box, and that I’m crazy for not being willing to die so the Jews can manipulate God via the Western Wall. Well, victims of 9/11 did. Of course, the “reality” is, Garrido kidnapped an 11-year-old girl; but the Jew killed many Palestinians during their violent intrusions. I must be “crazy” for thinking that murder of many is worse than the kidnapping of one. Oh my God, someone please get me a psychiatrist! We are so lucky we have Presidents who are really smart. And, once a bank president insulted me while discussing the media: “Well, those are smart people.” The “people” of the United States are so lucky. I’m learning.
Now let me get this right, Israel’s important take over of Jerusalem has been the root cause of attacks we’ve received from alQaeda, Libya, Iraq, etc., and now we’re having to deal with the nuclear technology of Iran. If I would have said in 1948 that Israel’s take over of Palestine would eventually lead to nuclear war, you all would have thought I was… crazy, plum nuts, not anywhere smart as our government and media leaders, etc.
If all plumbers are plum nuts, how many plums can a plum nuts plumber plum?
Intelligent sounding Mr. Articulate Bret Baier with Fox News was telling us all the other day on some special about Israel, how the Jews talk to God through the Western Wall. Sounded more like “intelligent” reasons why we should support Israel, and therefore allow a war with Iran.
Well, if you ask the Jews why they wouldn’t consider a home in West Texas, I’d imagine they’d tell you. Of course, you’re thinking that the Jews deserve their own country. Okay, then just make West Texas an independent country. (You’ve got to get up pretty early in the morning to outwit me.) Well, you know that religious cop-outs and “black box” kinds of communication is the sole reason for us all having to be threatened with this (real) end of the world stuff. (Maybe you didn’t know it before, but you know it now.)
Luke 15:7:
“I say to you that likewise there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine just persons who need no repentance.”
There’s your chance Hannity.
Fox News said that Israel is about to begin air strikes against Iran:
Well, I don’t know if they are, but I know that Iran would sure be ethically justified making air strikes against Israel after that threat. You know, like the Japanese did at Pearl Harbor. When “smart” people start threatening Russia or China in the same manner, then that ought to pretty much take care of it all. Or, if Russia or China make the same kind of threats against us. That’d pretty much shut the book. At least I’d know that we didn’t go down in vain, as it is so important how the Jews were able to manipulate God at the Western Wall.
Don’t forget to say something for the defenseless animals, Mr. Critical:
I remember in the days when dead people would walk around, how it reminded me of eating fried chicken. I’d rip the skin off with my teeth, slop it up in my mouth, then gobble it on down. Yeah, back then, those spooks would have to worry about me taking a bite out of them!
Mr. Critical – Y’alls probably think I’m really from nearby Peculiar, Missouri.
TO SEE PRIOR SUPERIOR WRITINGS (and more):
http://www.the-Goldenrule.name/